Hollanders Grappling
with Evil, discussed evil among other things. He brought up how evil has
been woven into our society and the media. He gave a good example by pointing
out how far you have to look for a show or movie that is devoid of killing or
bloodshed. These evil acts are being watched as entertainment. Even if they are
seen as the villain, we still do not mind watching these violent acts be committed.
While talking on evil, it is made apparent that evil is inescapable. Day to day
we are subjected to various tiny evils. This brought to my mind the concept of
original sin and how sin is automatically present within our lives. The fact
that we enjoy watching films and shows that include evil can lead to people
thinking that this is a result of original sin.
Another topic discussed was moral relativism. From what I
read I took moral relativism to be the embodiment of being in the gray
area. The difference in morals and
judgements from person to person could lead to conflict. With moral relativism,
this is a non-issue because we learn to tolerate those who have a different set
of morals than our own. Moral relativism can lead to dangerous thinking. I feel
that some sets of morals cannot be tolerated. If in one person’s moral code
killing a man is just then we should not simply tolerate his moral code.
Granted this is a rather extreme case, however there are flaws in the thought
process of a person who believes in moral relativism. It seems to be more of a
passive ideology which avoids conflict but not necessarily the issues at hand.
No comments:
Post a Comment